Statistical prediction alone cannot identify good models of behavior

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e408 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The dissociation between statistical prediction and scientific explanation advanced by Bowers et al. for studies of vision using deep neural networks is also observed in several other domains of behavior research, and is in fact unavoidable when fitting large models such as deep nets and other supervised learners, with weak theoretical commitments, to restricted samples of highly stochastic behavioral phenomena.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Individual survival time prediction using statistical models.R. Henderson - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (12):703-706.
Contrastive, non-probabilistic statistical explanations.Bruce Glymour - 1998 - Philosophy of Science 65 (3):448-471.
Clinical, Statistical, and Broken-Leg Predictions.Kurt Salzinger - 2005 - Behavior and Philosophy 33:91 - 99.
Linear models in decision making.Robyn M. Dawes & Bernard Corrigan - 1974 - Psychological Bulletin 81 (2):95-106.
Predicting and explaining with machine learning models: Social science as a touchstone.Oliver Buchholz & Thomas Grote - 2023 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 102 (C):60-69.
Descriptive understanding and prediction in COVID-19 modelling.Johannes Findl & Javier Suárez - 2021 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 43 (4):1-31.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-12-08

Downloads
7 (#1,379,768)

6 months
7 (#419,635)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references