Lakatos vs. Popper (Lakatos vs. Popper)

Filosofie Dnes 2 (1):29-43 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Cieľom tohto článku nie je, primárne, rozobrať Popperovu teóriu vedy, ale 1. predstaviť Lakatosove námietky proti tejto teórii; 2. kriticky ich analyzovať z hľadiska Popperovej teórie; a 3. vysvetliť, prečo justifikacionista Lakatos nemohol oceniť Popperov skepticizmus.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.26806/fd.v2i1.279

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

What did Popper learn from Lakatos?Bence Nanay - 2017 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25 (6):1202-1215.
Lakatos' modification of Popper's falsificationism.Mo Liu - 2005 - Dissertation, University of Edinburgh
Science sans Subjectivity: The Sad Case of Imre Lakatos.Joseph Agassi - 2020 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 51 (5):507-511.
Popper, Kuhn, Lakatos, and Aim-Oriented Empiricism.Nicholas Maxwell - 2005 - Philosophia 32 (1-4):181-239.
The bid to transcend Popper, and the Lakatos-Polanyi connection.Stefania Ruzsits Jha - 2006 - Perspectives on Science 14 (3):318-346.
Lakatos, Reason, and Rationality.Gabor Forrai - 2002 - In G. Kampis L. Kvasz & M. Stöltzner (eds.), Appraising Lakatos: Mathematics, Methodology, and the Man. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 73-83.
Lakatos' Criticisms of Popper.Donald Gillies - 2002 - In George Kampis, Ladislav Kvasz & Michael Stöltzner (eds.), Appraising Lakatos: Mathematics, Methodology and the Man. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 13-22.
The propositional content of the Popper-Lakatos rift.John Watkins - 2002 - In G. Kampis, L.: Kvasz & M. Stöltzner (eds.), Appraising Lakatos: Mathematics, Methodology and the Man. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 3--12.
The propositional content of the Popper-Lakatos rift.G. Kampis, L. Kvasz & M. Stoltzner - 2002 - In G. Kampis, L.: Kvasz & M. Stöltzner (eds.), Appraising Lakatos: Mathematics, Methodology and the Man. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 1--3.
Ciencia y Pseudociencia en Lakatos.Ulises Nickles - 1999 - Cinta de Moebio 5.
A critique of Popper's views on scientific method.Nicholas Maxwell - 1972 - Philosophy of Science 39 (2):131-152.
Ciencia y Pseudociencia en Lakatos La Falsación del Falsacionismo y la Problemática de la Demarcación.Ulises Nickles - 1998 - Cinta de Moebio 4.
The Popper-Lakatos Controversy in the Light of 'Die Beiden Grundprobleme der Erkenntnistheorie. [REVIEW]Karl R. Popper - 1983 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 34 (2):149-171.
Falsificationism and Research Programmes: Impact of Popper and Lakatos on Economic Methodology (4th edition).John Owen E. Adimike - 2022 - Dominican University Journal of Humanities 4:150-166.
The 'Popperian Programme' and mathematics.Eduard Glas - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (1):119-137.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-04-20

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references