Speech Act Theory and Ethics of Speech Processing as Distinct Stages: the ethics of collecting, contextualizing and the releasing of (speech) data

2023 Ieee International Symposium on Ethics in Engineering, Science, and Technology (Ethics), West Lafayette, in, Usa (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Using speech act theory from the Philosophy of Language, this paper attempts to develop an ethical framework for the phenomenon of speech processing. We use the concepts of the illocutionary force and the illocutionary content of a speech act to explain the ethics of speech processing. By emphasizing the different stages involved in speech processing, we explore the distinct ethical issues that arise in relation to each stage. Input, processing, and output are the different ethically relevant stages under which a spoken item or a speech navigates within the range of speech-processing modules. Employing the illocutionary force-content distinction, we specify and characterize the input-related ethical issues, the output-related ethical issues, and the processing-related ethical issues involved in speech processing. Together with illocutionary force-content distinction, we employ the data-information distinction to characterize the stage-wise ethical issues in the phenomenon of speech processing as the ethics of collecting (speech) data, the ethics of contextualizing (speech) data/information, and the ethics of releasing the con-textualized information (processed speech). Immediate ethical issues that arise from the range of speech processing modules are distinguished from distant ethical issues. We also indicate the nature of ethical issues that arise from Speaker Independent speech technologies.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The ethics of free speech.Mary Kate McGowan - 2010 - In John Skorupski (ed.), The Routledge Companion to Ethics. Routledge. pp. 769-780.
Unspeakable: a feminist ethic of speech.Betty McLellan - 2010 - Townsville, Qld.: OtherWise Publications.
Are There Any Subsentential Speech Acts?Joanna Odrowąż-Sypniewska - 2017 - Studia Semiotyczne—English Supplement 29:248-271.
Oppressive speech.Mary Kate McGowan - 2009 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (3):389 – 407.
Transformations of Illocutionary Acts.Aaron Sloman - 1969 - Analysis 30 (2):56 - 59.
Privacy, speech, and values: what we have no business knowing.Adam D. Moore - 2016 - Ethics and Information Technology 18 (1):41-49.
Speech Acts and Performatives.Jennifer Hornsby - 2006 - In Ernest Lepore & Barry C. Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press.
Speech Acts.Mitchell S. Green - 2010 - In Timothy O'Connor & Constantine Sandis (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Action. Oxford, UK: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 58–66.
Sincerely, Anonymous.Grace Paterson - 2020 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 9 (3):167-176.
Hate Crimes, Literature, and Speech.L. W. Sumner - 2005 - In R. G. Frey & Christopher Heath Wellman (eds.), A Companion to Applied Ethics. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 142–153.
Free Speech and Liberal Community.Gerald Lang - 2019 - In Joe Saunders & Carl Fox (eds.), Media Ethics, Free Speech, and the Requirements of Democracy. Routledge. pp. 105-123.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-07-11

Downloads
311 (#63,582)

6 months
202 (#13,122)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jolly Thomas
Indian Institute of Technology, Dharwad

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references