David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (2):147-152 (1997)
: Fins, Bacchetta, and Miller's clinical pragmatism has several appealing features: an emphasis on dialogue, a commitment to consensus, a focus on particular individuals rather than persons in general, and a strong interest in the process as well as the product of moral decision making. Nevertheless, for all its protests to the contrary, clinical pragmatism has a tendency to privilege medical facts over nonmedical values, to conflate appropriate medical decisions with right moral decisions, and to conceive problems at the bedside in terms of "getting" patients and families to "go along" with the treatment plans of clinicians. In sum, there is within clinical pragmatism the potential for physicians to take back some of the power they ceded to patients during the height of the patients' rights and autonomy movement. Provided that clinicians guard against the temptation to use clinical pragmatism manipulatively, however, the method promises, more than most other methods of moral problem solving, to help increasingly diverse individuals make good moral decisions about patients' care under conditions of enormous uncertainty
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
K. A. Wallace (2009). Common Morality and Moral Reform. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (1):55-68.
Similar books and articles
Robert M. Veatch (1997). Who Should Manage Care? The Case for Patients. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (4):391-401.
Joseph J. Fins, Franklin G. Miller & Matthew D. Bacchetta (1998). Clinical Pragmatism: Bridging Theory and Practice. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 8 (1):37-42.
Lynn A. Jansen (1998). Assessing Clinical Pragmatism. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 8 (1):23-36.
Joseph J. Fins (2006). Clinical Pragmatism and the Care of Brain Damaged Patients: Towards a Palliative Neuroethics for Disorders of Consciousness. In Steven Laureys (ed.), Boundaries of Consciousness. Elsevier
D. Micah Hester (2003). Is Pragmatism Well-Suited to Bioethics? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28 (5 & 6):545 – 561.
David H. Brendel & Franklin G. Miller (2008). A Plea for Pragmatism in Clinical Research Ethics. American Journal of Bioethics 8 (4):24 – 31.
Joseph J. Fins (1998). Approximation and Negotiation: Clinical Pragmatism and Difference. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (1):68-76.
Robert Brandom (2011). Perspectives on Pragmatism: Classical, Recent, and Contemporary. Harvard University Press.
Joseph J. Fins, Matthew D. Bacchetta & Franklin G. Miller (1997). Clinical Pragmatism: A Method of Moral Problem Solving. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (2):129-143.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #617,093 of 1,796,319 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #468,135 of 1,796,319 )
How can I increase my downloads?