Graduate studies at Western
Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:221-234 (2003)
|Abstract||One way to work toward intercultural understanding is through interreligious dialogue, given the centrality that religion often has in a culture. David Burrell has suggested that Maimonides and Aquinas can offer us principles for interreligious dialogue. In particular, he argues that their negative theology shows us the impossibility of one tradition claiming a better understanding of God than those advanced by other traditions. This should lead religious traditions away fromcompetition and toward dialogue. In my paper, I propose a critique of Burrell’s thesis, arguing for a different interpretation of Maimonides and Aquinas and adifferent understanding of interreligious dialogue. While it is true that Maimonides and Aquinas have a well-developed sense of the limits of our theological knowledge, they do not draw the conclusion that these limitations necessarily make all understandings of God equal. I think Maimonides and Aquinas show us instead that the firmest basis for interreligious dialogue is the recognition that some genuine knowledge of the divine is available to all, regardless of religious tradition|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Douglas Pratt (2007). Pluralism, Postmodernism and Interreligious Dialogue. Sophia 46 (3):245-261.
John R. Friday (2012). Critical Realism as a Philosophical Foundation for Interreligious Dialogue. Philosophy and Theology 24 (1):113-135.
Kenneth Seeskin (2002). Sanctity and Silence. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (1):7-24.
Ariane Hentsch Cisneros (2011). Understanding Through Appropriation in Interreligious Dialogue on Ethics. Journal of Religious Ethics 39 (2):246-259.
Willy Pfändtner (2010). Constructive Dialogical Pluralism: A Context of Interreligious Relations. Sophia 49 (1):65-94.
Jennifer Hart Weed (2008). Maimonides and Aquinas: A Medieval Misunderstanding? Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 64 (1):379 - 396.
Sumner B. Twiss & Bruce Grelle (eds.) (2000). Explorations in Global Ethics: Comparative Religious Ethics and Interreligious Dialogue. Westview Press.
David Burrell (1984). Maimonides, Aquinas and Gersonides on Providence and Evil. Religious Studies 20 (3):335 - 351.
Moses Maimonides & Salo Wittmayer Baron (eds.) (1941/1966). Essays on Maimonides. New York, Ams Press.
Michael P. Levine (1986). The Role of Reason in the Ethics of Maimonides: Or, Why Maimonides Could Have Had a Doctrine of Natural Law Even If He Did Not. Journal of Religious Ethics 14 (2):279 - 295.
David B. Burrell (2002). A Philosophical Foray Into Difference and Dialogue. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (1):181-194.
Marianne Moyaert (2008). In Response to the Religious Other : Levinas, Interreligious Dialogue and the Otherness of the Other. In Roger Burggraeve (ed.), The Awakening to the Other: A Provocative Dialogue with Emmanuel Levinas. Peeters.
Francis J. Catania (1988). Knowing the Unknowable God: Ibn-Sina, Maimonides, Aquinas. By David B. Burrell. The Modern Schoolman 65 (2):131-132.
Added to index2011-12-01
Total downloads3 ( #213,863 of 739,368 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,368 )
How can I increase my downloads?