System-justifying motives can lead to both the acceptance and the rejection of innate explanations for group differences

, , &
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (5):503-504 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Recent experimental evidence indicates that intuitions about inherence and system justification are distinct psychological processes, and that the inherence heuristic supplies important explanatory frameworks that are accepted or rejected based on their consistency with one's motivation to justify the system.

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s0140525x13003890

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Is the inherence heuristic needed to understand system-justifying tendencies among children?Anna-Kaisa Newheiser & Kristina R. Olson - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (5):496-497.
Why does the "mental shotgun" fire system-justifying bullets?Danielle Gaucher & John T. Jost - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (5):489-489.
The motivated use and neglect of base rates.Eric Luis Uhlmann, Victoria L. Brescoll & David Pizarro - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (3):284-285.
A Reintroduction of the Mirroring View in Allen Buchanan's The Heart of Human Rights.[author unknown] - unknown
Do we need the inherence heuristic to explain the bias towards inherent explanantions?Yarrow Dunham - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (5):488-489.
Can the inherence heuristic explain vitalistic reasoning?Brock Bastain - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (5):482-483.
Reasoning About Collectively Accepted Group Beliefs.Raul Hakli & Sara Negri - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 40 (4):531-555.
Refining and expanding the proposal of an inherence heuristic in human understanding.Andrei Cimpian & Erika Salomon - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (5):506-527.
Refutation Systems for a System of Nonsense-Logic.Robert Sochacki - 2011 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 20 (3):233-239.
What's so insidious about “Peace, Love, and Understanding”? A system justification perspective.John T. Jost, Chadly Stern & David A. Kalkstein - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (6):438-439.
The Objects of Acceptance: Competing Scientific Explanations.Ronald C. Hopson - 1972 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1972:349 - 363.
Motive zu moralischem Handeln.Christopher Lumer - 2002 - Analyse & Kritik 24 (2):163-188.
Complements, not competitors: causal and mathematical explanations.Holly Andersen - 2017 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 69 (2):485-508.
Efficacious and Sufficient Grace.Heidi Russell - 2010 - Philosophy and Theology 22 (1-2):353-372.
Does the inherence herutistic take s to psychological essentialism?Anna Marmodoro, Robin A. Murphy & A. G. Baker - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (5):494-495.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-11-09

Downloads
40 (#396,139)

6 months
19 (#133,897)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references