The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 3:197-218 (2007)
|Abstract||In the following, I will discuss the current social reaction to the ecological crisis and the ways in which society reacts to technological risks, which can be understood primarily as a reaction to scientific and moral or ethical uncertainty. In the first section, I will clarify what is meant by scientific and moral or ethical uncertainty. In the second section, I will contrast Max Weber's differentiation of science, law [Recht) and morality in the modern world with the process of de-differentiation of these value spheres, a trend which can be observed in the present-day context of the ecological crisis and technological risks. We shall see that social contradictions emerge in the functional relationships between these value spheres, and that such contradictions go hand in hand with these value spheres or contexts of discourse either losing their original function or becoming transformed. Science forfeits its role as a functional authority and becomes a strategic resource for politics. Law becomes a basic constituent of an amoral form of negotiation, which can no longer be properly grasped in terms of legal categories. Morality is transformed into fear, and economics yields unprofitable practices. In the third section, I will in attempt to open up the moral and ethical dimension of how to deal with uncertainty with the help of discourse theory (Apel, 1988; Habermas, 1996), as well as outline a possible solution|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
René von Schomberg (ed.) (1993). Science, Politics, and Morality: Scientific Uncertainty and Decision Making. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Miguel de Beistegui (2008). The Erosion of Democracy. Research in Phenomenology 38 (2):157-173.
Neil Remington Abramson (forthcoming). Kierkegaardian Confessions: The Relationship Between Moral Reasoning and Failure to Be Promoted. Journal of Business Ethics.
Hans Henrik Bruun (2008). Objectivity, Value Spheres, and "Inherent Laws": On Some Suggestive Isomorphisms Between Weber, Bourdieu, and Luhmann. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (1):97-120.
Roselie Mc Devitt & Joan Van Hise (2002). Influences in Ethical Dilemmas of Increasing Intensity. Journal of Business Ethics 40 (3):261 - 274.
Harry F. Dahms (1997). Theory in Weberian Marxism: Patterns of Critical Social Theory in Lukacs and Habermas. Sociological Theory 15 (3):181-214.
John Skorupski (2009). The Unity and Diversity of Reasons. In Simon Robertson (ed.), Spheres of Reason. Oxford University Press.
Marcus Düwell (1999). Aesthetic Experience, Medical Practice, and Moral Judgement. Critical Remarks on Possibilities to Understand a Complex Relationship. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 2 (2):161-168.
C. Wesley Demarco (2007). Spheres of Power, Spheres of Freedom: Practical Lessons From Jewish Neoplatonism. The Pluralist 2 (1):84 - 107.
Peter Barker (1990). Copernicus, the Orbs, and the Equant. Synthese 83 (2):317 - 323.
Lorenzo Magnani (2007). Morality in a Technological World: Knowledge as Duty. Cambridge University Press.
John J. Hanafin (2002). Morality and the Market in China: Some Contemporary Views. Business Ethics Quarterly 12 (1):1-18.
Sun Demirli (2010). Indiscernibility and Bundles in a Structure. Philosophical Studies 7 (1):1-18.
John D. Dadosky (2009). Recovering Beauty in the Subject. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 83 (4):509-532.
Gili S. Drori (ed.) (2003). Science in the Modern World Polity: Institutionalization and Globalization. Stanford University Press.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads3 ( #202,008 of 549,122 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,122 )
How can I increase my downloads?