- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Who sees human? The stability and importance of individual differences in anthropomorphism
Perspectives on Psychological Science 5 (3):219-232 (2010)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
How Children and Adults Represent God's Mind.Larisa Heiphetz, Jonathan D. Lane, Adam Waytz & Liane L. Young - 2016 - Cognitive Science 40 (1):121-144.
Individual differences transcend the rationality debate.Elizabeth J. Newton & Maxwell J. Roberts - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):530-531.
Anthropomorphism and Anthropomorphic Selection—Beyond the "Cute Response".James Serpell - 2002 - Society and Animals 10 (4):437-454.
Individual differences in the perception of biological motion: Links to social cognition and motor imagery.Luke E. Miller & Ayse P. Saygin - 2013 - Cognition 128 (2):140-148.
Critical Anthropomorphism and Animal Ethics.Fredrik Karlsson - 2012 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (5):707-720.
Individual differences in the consciousness of phantom Limbs.J. M. Katz - 2000 - In Robert G. Kunzendorf & B. Alan Wallace (eds.), Individual Differences in Conscious Experience. John Benjamins. pp. 45--97.
Can social interaction constitute social cognition?Hanne De Jaegher, Ezequiel Di Paolo & Shaun Gallagher - 2010 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14 (10):441-447.
Social Cognition and Social Values in Bullying.Jon Sutton - 2003 - In B. Repacholi & V. Slaughter (eds.), Individual Differences in Theory of Mind: Implications for Typical and Atypical Development. Hove, E. Sussex: Psychology Press. pp. 99.
Making sense by making sentient: Effectance motivation increases anthropomorphism.Adam Waytz, Carey K. Morewedge, Nicholas Epley, George Monteleone, Jia-Hong Gao & John T. Cacioppo - 2010 - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 99 (3):410-435.
Variations on a human universal: Individual differences in positivity offset and negativity bias.Tiffany Ito & John Cacioppo - 2005 - Cognition and Emotion 19 (1):1-26.
Similarities and differences in dream content at the cross-cultural, gender, and individual levels.G. William Domhoff & Adam Schneider - 2008 - Consciousness and Cognition 17 (4):1257-1265.
Moral Universals and Individual Differences.Liane Young & Rebecca Saxe - 2011 - Emotion Review 3 (3):323-324.
On the role of social interaction in social cognition: a mechanistic alternative to enactivism.Mitchell Herschbach - 2012 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 11 (4):467-486.
Causes of Individual Differences in Animal Exploration and Search.Simon M. Reader - 2015 - Topics in Cognitive Science 7 (3):451-468.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-05-26
Downloads
0
6 months
0
2016-05-26
Downloads
0
6 months
0
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Citations of this work
Anthropomorphism in AI.Arleen Salles, Kathinka Evers & Michele Farisco - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 11 (2):88-95.
Cognitive biases explain religious belief, paranormal belief, and belief in life’s purpose.Aiyana K. Willard & Ara Norenzayan - 2013 - Cognition 129 (2):379-391.
Robots As Intentional Agents: Using Neuroscientific Methods to Make Robots Appear More Social.Eva Wiese, Giorgio Metta & Agnieszka Wykowska - 2017 - Frontiers in Psychology 8:281017.
A Pragmatic Approach to the Intentional Stance Semantic, Empirical and Ethical Considerations for the Design of Artificial Agents.Guglielmo Papagni & Sabine Koeszegi - 2021 - Minds and Machines 31 (4):505-534.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-55b469568f-znn98 uwo