Activists, pragmatists, technophiles and tree-huggers? Gender differences in employees' environmental attitudes
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 28 (3):211 - 222 (2000)
Although there are suggestions that the environmental attitudes of men and of women differ, there have been few studies that study and evaluate these differences at the workplace. Given the claim of Ecofeminist writers about the environmental superiority of women's environmental attitudes, and the proclaimed need of business to change attitudes and behaviour with regard to the environment, this is a surprise. The paper is based on 1022 (37% from women) questionnaires which were collected in a U.K. pharmaceutical company, and it compares the empirical results with environmental attitude archetypes, such as those prescribed by O'Riordan. However, the attitude clusters that were found do not correspond greatly with such theoretical modes of environmental ethics. Instead, it appears that women were more likely to be actively involved in environmental behaviour, and showed greater scepticism towards the role of technology in the search for solutions to environmental problems. In addition, men sought to a much greater extent a consistency between an environmental rationality and their behaviour. Men's attitudes were also much more influenced by their position in the organisational hierarchy. There were few significant differences across age groups.
|Keywords||Philosophy Ethics Business Education Economic Growth Management|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
C. B. Bhattacharya, Daniel Korschun & Sankar Sen (2009). Strengthening Stakeholder–Company Relationships Through Mutually Beneficial Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics 85 (2):257 - 272.
Danae Manika, Victoria K. Wells, Diana Gregory-Smith & Michael Gentry (forthcoming). The Impact of Individual Attitudinal and Organisational Variables on Workplace Environmentally Friendly Behaviours. Journal of Business Ethics.
Similar books and articles
Lars Samuelsson (2010). Environmental Pragmatism and Environmental Philosophy. Environmental Ethics 32 (4):405-415.
A. Catherine McCabe, Rhea Ingram & Mary Conway Dato-on (2006). The Business of Ethics and Gender. Journal of Business Ethics 64 (2):101 - 116.
Jennifer J. Eldridge & John P. Gluck (1996). Gender Differences in Attitudes Toward Animal Research. Ethics and Behavior 6 (3):239 – 256.
Glen C. Filson (1993). Comparative Differences in Ontario Farmers' Environmental Attitudes. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 6 (2):165-184.
P. Aarne Vesilind (1996). There is No Such Thing as Environmental Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (3):307-318.
Anna-Maija Lämsä, Meri Vehkaperä, Tuomas Puttonen & Hanna-Leena Pesonen (2008). Effect of Business Education on Women and Men Students' Attitudes on Corporate Responsibility in Society. Journal of Business Ethics 82 (1):45 - 58.
Jan E. Stets & Chris F. Biga (2003). Bringing Identity Theory Into Environmental Sociology. Sociological Theory 21 (4):398-423.
David L. Gadenne, Jessica Kennedy & Catherine McKeiver (2009). An Empirical Study of Environmental Awareness and Practices in Smes. Journal of Business Ethics 84 (1):45 - 63.
Bernard E. Whitley (2001). Gender Differences in Affective Responses to Having Cheated: The Mediating Role of Attitudes. Ethics and Behavior 11 (3):249 – 259.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #281,563 of 1,410,220 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #155,456 of 1,410,220 )
How can I increase my downloads?