David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (3):171--185 (2008)
In response to physicians who refuse to provide medical services that are contrary to their ethical and/or religious beliefs, it is sometimes asserted that anyone who is not willing to provide legally and professionally permitted medical services should choose another profession. This article critically examines the underlying assumption that conscientious objection is incompatible with a physician’s professional obligations (the “incompatibility thesis”). Several accounts of the professional obligations of physicians are explored: general ethical theories (consequentialism, contractarianism, and rights-based theories), internal morality (essentialist and non-essentialist conceptions), reciprocal justice, social contract, and promising. It is argued that none of these accounts of a physician’s professional obligations unequivocally supports the incompatibility thesis.
|Keywords||Conscience Conscientious objection Doctor–patient relationship Professional obligations Ethics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Norman Daniels (2008). Just Health: Meeting Health Needs Fairly. Cambridge University Press.
Edmund D. Pellegrino (1993). The Virtues in Medical Practice. Oxford University Press.
Edmund D. Pellegrino (1981). A Philosophical Basis of Medical Practice: Toward a Philosophy and Ethic of the Healing Professions. Oxford University Press.
Edmund D. Pellegrino (2001). The Internal Morality of Clinical Medicine: A Paradigm for the Ethics of the Helping and Healing Professions. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (6):559 – 579.
Edmund D. Pellegrino (2006). Toward a Reconstruction of Medical Morality. American Journal of Bioethics 6 (2):65 - 71.
Citations of this work BETA
Jukka Varelius (2014). Medical Expertise, Existential Suffering and Ending Life. Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (2):104-107.
Jukka Varelius (2013). Voluntary Euthanasia, Physician-Assisted Suicide, and the Right to Do Wrong. HEC Forum 25 (3):1-15.
Jerome R. Wernow & Chris Gastmans (2010). A Review and Taxonomy of Argument-Based Ethics Literature Regarding Conscientious Objections to End-of-Life Procedures. Christian Bioethics 16 (3):274-295.
Byron J. Stoyles & Sorin Costreie (2013). Rethinking Voluntary Euthanasia. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38 (6):jht045.
Similar books and articles
M. Wreen (2007). Medical Futility and Physician Discretion. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1 (3):257-267.
Martin Benjamin (1985). Lay Obligations in Professional Relations. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (1):85-103.
Robert F. Card (2007). Conscientious Objection and Emergency Contraception. American Journal of Bioethics 7 (6):8 – 14.
Mark R. Wicclair (2011). Conscientious Objection in Health Care: An Ethical Analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Carolyn McLeod (2010). An Institutional Solution to Conflicts of Conscience in Medicine. Hastings Center Report 40 (6):41-42.
Mark R. Wicclair (2006). Pharmacies, Pharmacists, and Conscientious Objection. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 16 (3):225-250.
Zuzana Deans (2013). Conscientious Objections in Pharmacy Practice in Great Britain. Bioethics 27 (1):48-57.
J. L. A. Garcia (2007). Health Versus Harm: Euthanasia and Physicians' Duties. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (1):7 – 24.
Andrew Alexandra & Seumas Miller (2009). Ethical Theory, “Common Morality,” and Professional Obligations. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (1):69-80.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads83 ( #50,192 of 1,796,319 )
Recent downloads (6 months)17 ( #42,070 of 1,796,319 )
How can I increase my downloads?