David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Research in Phenomenology 41 (2):238-252 (2011)
The foundation of phenomenological image theories is the view that image perception leads to a perception sui generis . In order to grasp this peculiarity of image perception, two ways have traditionally been considered: either through a description of the particular object of image perception or through a description of the unique origin of image perception. This article explores a third way within the phenomenology of the image by trying to determine the uniqueness of image perception through its peculiar, necessary effects on the observer of the image. The thesis is: The observer of an image does not become an image object in the image. It is only in the case of image perception that there is relief through a gap in participation. It is the perception of something without the demand, as the perceiving person, of being physically involved in what is perceived
|Keywords||image perception phenomenological image theory picture participation spectator|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Stephen David Ross (2009). For Giving. International Studies in Philosophy Monograph Series:469-504.
Mohan Matthen (2014). Image Content. In Berit Brogaard (ed.), Does Perception Have Content? Oxford University Press 265-290.
Xiaoqiang Han (2008). Image-Based de Re Thought. Disputatio 2 (24):17.
Juhani Pallasmaa (2011). The Embodied Image: Imagination and Imagery in Architecture. John Wiley & Sons Inc..
Stephen David Ross (2010). Self Image. International Studies in Philosophy Monograph Series:97-127.
Trevor Perri (2013). Image and Ontology in Merleau-Ponty. Continental Philosophy Review 46 (1):75-97.
Patricia Pisters (2011). Synaptic Signals: Time Travelling Through the Brain in the Neuro-Image. Deleuze Studies 5 (2):261-274.
Susan Bredlau (2011). Monstrous Faces and a World Transformed: Merleau-Ponty, Dolezal, and the Enactive Approach on Vision Without Inversion of the Retinal Image. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 10 (4):481-498.
Jean Hering (1947). Concerning Image, Idea, and Dream (Translation). Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 8 (December):188-205.
Norman Malcolm (1953). Direct Perception. Philosophical Quarterly 3 (October):301-316.
Richard Terdiman (2008). Image-Times, Image-Histories, Image-Thinking. In Tyrus Miller (ed.), Given World and Time: Temporalities in Context. Ceu Press
Gunnar Karlsson (1996). The Experience of Spatiality for Congenitally Blind People: A Phenomenological-Psychological Study. [REVIEW] Human Studies 19 (3):303 - 330.
Sarah Posman (2009). Where has Gertrud(E) Gone? : Gertrude Stein's Cinematic Journey From Movement-Image to Time-Image. In Eugene W. Holland, Daniel W. Smith & Charles J. Stivale (eds.), Gilles Deleuze: Image and Text. Continuum 41--62.
Helge Malmgren (2004). The Manifest Image. In Christer Svennerlind (ed.), Ursus Philosophicus - Essays Dedicated to Björn Haglund on his Sixtieth Birthday. Philosophical Communications
Added to index2011-08-02
Total downloads28 ( #140,705 of 1,906,796 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #129,894 of 1,906,796 )
How can I increase my downloads?