Graduate studies at Western
Phronesis 50 (4):315-334 (2005)
|Abstract||There is a well-known tension in Plotinus' thought regarding the location of the intelligible region. He appears to make three mutually incompatible claims about it: (1) it is everywhere; (2) it is nowhere; and (3) it borders on the heavens, where the third claim is associated with Plotinus' affection for cosmic religion. Traditionally, although scholars have found a reasonable way to make sense of the compatibility of the first two claims, they have sought to relieve the tension generated by (3) by both downplaying the importance of cosmic religion to Plotinus and reinterpreting his spatial language metaphorically. In this paper I argue that both of these maneuvers are unsatisfactory. Rather, it is possible to reconcile Plotinus' metaphysics with the world-view of cosmic religion (CR world-view), i.e., to retain the spatial sense of Plotinus' language without making his metaphysics incoherent. In the first part of this paper, I show that cosmic religion is not just an awkward appendage to Plotinus' metaphysics. After explaining what cosmic religion involves, I argue that the CR world-view is in fact central to his natural philosophy. Then, I turn to the problem of the compatibility between cosmic religion and Plotinus' thought. By carefully considering how Aristotle's Prime Mover is present to his universe, I show how we can make claims (2) and (3) compatible for Plotinus. Then, I argue that Plotinus' own account of the omnipresence of soul and its powers' actualizations in particular locations provides a parallel to the problem of the compatibility between (1) and (3), and further that these two accounts can be combined to resolve completely the tension between the CR world-view and Plotinus' metaphysics. In the final section, I discuss the implications this has for our understanding of the soul's ascent and descent|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
J. Wilberding (2005). " Creeping Spatiality": The Location of Nous in Plotinus' Universe. Phronesis 50 (4):315 - 334.
Riccardo Chiaradonna (2012). Plotinus' Account of the Cognitive Powers of the Soul: Sense Perception and Discursive Thought. [REVIEW] Topoi 31 (2):191-207.
Georgios Lekkas (2005). Plotinus: Towards an Ontology of Likeness (on the One and Nous). International Journal of Philosophical Studies 13 (1):53 – 68.
Georgios Lekkas (2005). Plotinus: Towards an Ontology of Likeness (On the One and Nous). International Journal of Philosophical Studies 13 (1):53 - 68.
Annamaria Schiaparelli (2009). Plotinus on Dialectic. Archiv für Geschichte Der Philosophie 91 (3):253-287.
Rafael Pangilinan (2010). Evil in Plotinus’ Hypostases of Being. Philosophy Pathways (150).
Nora I. Ayala, The Influence of Plotinus on Marsilio Ficino's Doctrine of the Hierarchy of Being [Electronic Resource].
Pauliina Remes (2006). Plotinus's Ethics of Disinterested Interest. Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (1):1-23.
Frans A. J. de Haas (2001). Did Plotinus and Porphyry Disagree on Aristotle's Categories? Phronesis 46 (4):492-526.
Frans A. J. De Haas (2001). Did Plotinus and Porphyry Disagree on Aristotle's "Categories"? Phronesis 46 (4):492 - 526.
R. Ferwerda (1984). Pity in the Life and Thought of Plotinus. In David T. Runia (ed.), Plotinus Amid Gnostics and Christians: Papers Presented at the Plotinus Symposium Held at the Free University, Amsterdam, on 25 January 1984. Vu Uitgeverij/Free University Press.
J. Noel Hubler (2008). Locating the Cosmos in the Divine and the Body in the Soul. International Philosophical Quarterly 48 (3):321-335.
Eyjólfur Kjalar Emilsson (1988). Plotinus on Sense-Perception: A Philosophical Study. Cambridge University Press.
Christian Schäfer (2004). Matter in Plotinus's Normative Ontology. Phronesis 49 (3):266 - 294.
Added to index2010-08-31
Total downloads5 ( #170,270 of 739,354 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,354 )
How can I increase my downloads?