American Naturalism on Pantheism 1

Abstract
American naturalists all agree that traditional theism, with its belief in a supernatural personal god who is absolutely transcendent to nature, is inconsistent with the view that nature is all that there is. Yet despite the rejection of the traditional God of theism, some naturalists have found pantheism, with its belief in a divinity thoroughly immanent to nature, congenial. Nonetheless, no philosophically rigorous and systematic juxtaposition of the metaphysical and ethical commitments of pantheism with those of naturalism has been undertaken. This essay seeks to fill that gap by investigating the viability of pantheism from the perspective of the ordinal naturalism of Justus Buchler. Several reasons can be ..
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,357
External links
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA

    No citations found.

    Similar books and articles
    Robert Oakes (1983). Does Traditional Theism Entail Pantheism? American Philosophical Quarterly 20 (1):105 - 112.
    Michael P. Levine (1986). More on “Does Traditional Theism Entail Pantheism?”. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 20 (1):31 - 35.
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2011-09-21

    Total downloads

    9 ( #128,813 of 1,088,621 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #69,601 of 1,088,621 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.