Graduate studies at Western
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):627-627 (2003)
|Abstract||We draw an analogy between Hilbert's program (HP) for mathematics and Newell's program (NP) for cognitive modeling. The analogy reveals that NP, like HP before it, is fundamentally flawed. The only alternative is a program anchored by an admission that cognition is more than computation.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michael Stoeltzner, How Metaphysical is "Deepening the Foundations"? - Hahn and Frank on Hilbert's Axiomatic Method.
Paolo Mancosu (2003). The Russellian Influence on Hilbert and His School. Synthese 137 (1-2):59 - 101.
Jeremy Avigad, “Clarifying the Nature of the Infinite”: The Development of Metamathematics and Proof Theory.
Solomon Feferman (2008). Lieber Herr Bernays!, Lieber Herr Gödel! Gödel on Finitism, Constructivity and Hilbert's Program. Dialectica 62 (2: Table of Contents"/> Select):179–203.
Thomas Hofweber (2000). Proof-Theoretic Reduction as a Philosopher's Tool. Erkenntnis 53 (1-2):127-146.
Panu Raatikainen (2003). Hilbert's Program Revisited. Synthese 137 (1-2):157 - 177.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #142,372 of 739,304 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,304 )
How can I increase my downloads?