Reported Miracles [Book Review]

Philosophical Review 105 (4):538-540 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Joseph Houston’s book is a fine contribution to the philosophical investigation of the value of miracle reports for religious apologetics. It covers a wide range of arguments of interest to philosophers about the concept of miracles and the justifiability of belief in their occurrence, but it is also rich in theological and biblical sources. Houston’s reasoning throughout is careful and subtle, but neither technical nor excessively pedantic. So while the book is primarily intended for scholars, students should find it within their reach.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reported Miracles. [REVIEW]James A. Keller - 1996 - Faith and Philosophy 13 (2):286-293.
Miracles.Paul Fitzgerald - 1985 - Philosophical Forum 17 (1):48 - 64.
Reported Miracles. [REVIEW]Terence Penelhum - 1998 - International Studies in Philosophy 30 (4):123-124.
Proofs of miracles and miracles as proofs.Richard L. Purtill - 1976 - Christian Scholar’s Review 6.
Martin on Miracles.Michael Almeida - 2007 - Philo 10 (1):27-34.
Against Miracles.John Collier - 1986 - Dialogue 25 (2):349-.
Reconceiving Miracles.James E. Gilman - 1989 - Religious Studies 25 (4):477 - 487.
Miracles and Science: Mora than a Miraculous Relationship.Yiftach J. H. Fehige - 2012 - Toronto Journal of Theology 28 (1):159-163.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
19 (#795,462)

6 months
1 (#1,462,504)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Linda Zagzebski
University of Oklahoma

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references