La chair comme diacritique incarné

Chiasmi International 11:249-262 (2009)
Abstract
In 20th century thinking, few concepts have provoked as many misunderstandings as Merleau-Ponty’s notion of ‘Flesh’. Such misunderstandings (of which the article sketches the outline of an archaeology) rest on the initial assumption that the Flesh has to be derived from the body. The article suggests that the dominant readings of the Flesh can be organized along what could respectively be called the scenario of propriety and the scenario of expansion, beyond which a third way comes into view which does not think Flesh as plenitude, but as an interstitial fabric. In this sense, the genesis of the last ontology of the Flesh is neither to be found in Husserl or in a simple anti-Sartrianism, but in a fecund and still underestimated reading of Saussure’s notion of the diacritics. The ontological turn of the last writings can thus only be understood on the grounds of the expressive turn from the intermediate period.
Keywords Merleau-Ponty  Saussure  Husserl  flesh  embodiment
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/chiasmi20091143
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,300
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
On the Motivations for Merleau-Ponty's Ontological Research.Dimitris Apostolopoulos - forthcoming - British Journal for the History of Philosophy:1-23.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Cultivating Ethos Through the Body.Seamus Carey - 2000 - Human Studies 23 (1):23-42.
Our Element: Flesh and Democracy in Merleau-Ponty. [REVIEW]Martín Plot - 2012 - Continental Philosophy Review 45 (2):235-259.
Touch and Flesh in Aristotle's de Anima.Rebecca Steiner Goldner - 2011 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (2):435-446.
Merleau-Ponty and Irigaray in the Flesh.Elizabeth Grosz - 1999 - In Dorothea Olkowski & James Morley (eds.), Thesis Eleven. State University of New York Press. pp. 145-166.
Deleuze and Merleau-Ponty: Immanence, Univocity and Phenomenology.Jack Reynolds & Jon Roffe - 2006 - Journal of the British Society of Phenomenology 37 (3):228-51.
Riassunto: La carne come diacritico incarnato.Emmanuel Alloa - 2009 - Chiasmi International 11:262-262.
Merleau-Ponty and Buddhism.Y. Park Jin & Kopf Gereon (eds.) - 2009 - Lexington Books.
Chiasms: Merleau-Ponty's Notion of Flesh.Renaud Barbaras - 2000 - In Fred Evans & Leonard Lawlor (eds.). State University of New York Press. pp. 77-87.
The World at a Glance.Edward S. Casey - 2000 - In Fred Evans & Leonard Lawlor (eds.), Chiasms: Merleau-ponty's notion of flesh. State University of New York Press. pp. 147-164.
The Paradox of Expression.Bernhard Waldenfels - 2000 - In Fred Evans & Leonard Lawlor (eds.), Chiasms: Merleau-ponty's notion of flesh. Suny Press. pp. 89-102.
Added to PP index
2012-03-18

Total downloads
40 ( #132,949 of 2,193,100 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #290,277 of 2,193,100 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature