Is Health Inequality Across Individuals of Moral Concern?

Health Care Analysis 14 (1):25-36 (2006)

Abstract
The history of the documentation of health inequality is long. The way in which health inequality has customarily been documented is by comparing differences in the average health across groups, for example, by sex or gender, income, education, occupation, or geographic region. In the controversial World Health Report 2000, researchers at the World Health Organization criticized this traditional practice and proposed to measure health inequality across individuals irrespective of individuals’ group affiliation. They defended its proposal on the moral grounds without clear explanation. In this paper I ask: is health inequality across individuals of moral concern, and, if so, why? Clarification of these questions is crucial for meaningful interpretation of health inequality measured across individuals. Only if there was something morally problematic in health inequality across individuals, its reduction would be good news. Specifically, in this paper I provide three arguments for the moral significance of health inequality across individuals: (a) health is special, (b) health equity plays an important and unique role in the general pursuit of justice, and (c) health inequality is an indicator of general injustice in society. I then discuss three key questions to examine the validity of these arguments: (i) how special is health?, (ii) how good is health as an indicator?, and (iii) what do we mean by injustice? I conclude that health inequality across individuals is of moral interest with the arguments (b) and (c)
Keywords Ethics  Health inequality  Health inequity  Justice  Unit of analysis  World Health Organization
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10728-006-0008-6
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 39,951
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Spheres of Justice.Michael Walzer - 1983 - Basic Books.
Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare.Richard J. Arneson - 1989 - Philosophical Studies 56 (1):77 - 93.
Inequality Reexamined.John Roemer & Amartya Sen - 1994 - Philosophical Review 103 (3):554.
Just Health Care.Norman Daniels - 1985 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

What's Wrong with Health Inequalities?Daniel M. Hausman - 2007 - Journal of Political Philosophy 15 (1):46–66.
Primary Care, Patient Autonomy, and Healthcare Justice.Christopher P. Morley - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (10):22 – 23.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Is Inequality Bad for Our Health?Jeffrey D. Milyo & Jennifer M. Mellor - 1999 - Critical Review 13 (3-4):359-372.
Health and Inequality, or, Why Justice is Good for Our Health.Norman Daniels, Bruce Kennedy & Ichiro Kawachi - 2004 - In Sudhir Anand, Fabienne Peter & Amartya Sen (eds.), Public Health, Ethics, and Equity. Oxford University Press. pp. 63--91.
Broadening the Bioethics Agenda.Dan W. Brock - 2000 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 10 (1):21-38.
Norman Daniels. Just Health.T. Wilkinson - 2008 - Public Health Ethics 1 (3):268-272.
Gender and Global Health: Inequality and Differences.L. Doyal, S. Payne, S. Benatar & G. Brock - 2011 - In S. R. Benatar & Gillian Brock (eds.), Global Health and Global Health Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
How Should Political Philosophers Think of Health?D. M. Weinstock - 2011 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (4):424-435.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-24

Total views
24 ( #332,302 of 2,235,641 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #455,429 of 2,235,641 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature