Moral Agency, Commitment, and Impartiality

Social Philosophy and Policy 13 (1):1-26 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Communitarians reject the impartial and universal viewpoint of liberal morality in favor of the "situated" viewpoint of the agent's community, and elevate political community into the moral community. I show that the preeminence of political community in communitarian morality is incompatible with concern for people's lives in the partial communities of family, friends, or others. Ironically, it is also incompatible with the communitarian thesis about the situated nature of moral agency. Political community is preeminent in communitarianism because of its unargued-for assumption that a good society is a morally unified society. I further argue that the ability to take the impartial standpoint is essential to the ability to make particular commitments that have an intrinsic human importance.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-07-06

Downloads
371 (#52,432)

6 months
149 (#21,381)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Neera K. Badhwar
University of Oklahoma

References found in this work

Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality.Michael Walzer - 1983 - Journal of Business Ethics 4 (1):63-64.
The schizophrenia of modern ethical theories.Michael Stocker - 1976 - Journal of Philosophy 73 (14):453-466.
Whose Justice? Which Rationality?Alasdair Macintyre - 1988 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 23 (3):242-247.

View all 21 references / Add more references