Empathy with vicious perspectives? A puzzle about the moral limits of empathetic imagination

Synthese 199 (3-4):9621-9647 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Are there limits to what it is morally okay to imagine? More particularly, is imaginatively inhabiting morally suspect perspectives something that is off-limits for truly virtuous people? In this paper, I investigate the surprisingly fraught relation between virtue and a familiar form of imaginative perspective taking I call empathy. I draw out a puzzle about the relation between empathy and virtuousness. First, I present an argument to the effect that empathy with vicious attitudes is not, in fact, something that the fully virtuous person can indulge in. At least one prominent way of thinking about the psychology of the virtuous person excludes the possibility that the virtuous could emotionally apprehend the world in a less than virtuous way, and empathizing with vicious outlooks does seem to run afoul of that restriction. Then, I develop an argument that runs in the contrary direction: virtue in fact requires empathy with vicious outlooks, at least in some situations. There is reason to think that a crucial part of being virtuous is ministering effectively to others’ needs, and there is also reason to think that other people may need to be empathized with, even if their emotional outlooks are at least minorly vicious. Finally, I outline two different solutions to this puzzle. Both solutions hold some promise, but they also bring new challenges in their train.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Virtuous and Vicious Anger.Bommarito Nicolas - 2017 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 11 (3):1-28.
In Defense of the Moral Significance of Empathy.Aaron Simmons - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (1):97-111.
To Become Good.Howard J. Curzer - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 3:106-111.
Neo-Aristotelian Supererogation.Rebecca Stangl - 2016 - Ethics 126 (2):339-365.
Empathy for the Devil.Adam Morton - 2011 - In Amy Coplan & Peter Goldie (eds.), Empathy: Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives. Oxford University Press. pp. 318.
Meeting with the Depicted Other.Marge Paas - 2015 - Philosophy Study 5 (10).
The Ethics and Epistemology of Empathy.Olivia Bailey - 2018 - Dissertation, Harvard University
Empathy and Testimonial Trust.Olivia Bailey - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 84:139-160.
Four Solutions to the Alleged Incompleteness of Virtue Ethics.Sean McAleer - 2010 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 4 (3):1-20.
Empathy and Its Role in Morality.Meghan Masto - 2015 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 53 (1):74-96.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-05-28

Downloads
106 (#115,088)

6 months
19 (#51,584)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Olivia Bailey
University of California, Berkeley

Citations of this work

When and why to empathize with political opponents.Hannah Read - forthcoming - Philosophical Studies:1-21.

Add more citations