Explaining Temporal Phenomenology: Hume’s Extensionalism and Kant’s Apriorism
Kant Studien 110 (3):463-476 (2019)
Abstract
The empiricist needs to explain the origin, in perception, of the idea of time. Kant believed the only answer was a kind of idealism about time. This essay examines Hume’s extensionalism as a possible answer to Kant. Extensionalism allegedly accounts for the experience of time via the manner of presentation of experiences, rather than the content of experience.Author's Profile
DOI
10.1515/kant-2019-3006
My notes
Similar books and articles
Kant, Hume and causality.D. A. Rohatyn - 1975 - Zeitschrift Für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 6 (1):34-36.
The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Temporal Experience: Routledge Handbooks in Philosophy.Ian Phillips (ed.) - 2017 - New York: Routledge.
”A succession of feelings, in and of itself, is not a feeling of succession’.Christoph Hoerl - 2013 - Mind 122 (486):373-417.
Sense, Reason and Causality in Hume and Kant.A. Nuyen - 1990 - Société Française de Philosophie, Bulletin 81 (1):57.
Empiricism, Time-Awareness, and Hume's Manners of Disposition.Adrian Bardon - 2007 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 5 (1):47-63.
Kant's answer to Hume: How Kant should have tried to stand Hume's copy thesis on its head.Steven M. Bayne - 2000 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 8 (2):207 – 224.
Turnabout is Fair Play: A New Humean Response in the Old Debate with Kant.Peter Thielke - 2015 - Hume Studies 41 (2):263-288.
On Hume’s Theory of Consciousness.Fred Wilson - 1995 - Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 18 (1):271-276.
Analytics
Added to PP
2019-09-07
Downloads
28 (#418,731)
6 months
3 (#225,816)
2019-09-07
Downloads
28 (#418,731)
6 months
3 (#225,816)
Historical graph of downloads
