Acta Analytica 35 (4):469-492 ()

Authors
Alex Barber
Open University (UK)
Abstract
When a novel scientific theory conflicts with otherwise plausible moral assumptions, we do not treat that as evidence against the theory. We may scrutinize the empirical data more keenly and take extra care over its interpretation, but science is in some core sense immune to moral refutation. Can the same be said of philosophical theories? If a position in the philosophy of mind, for example, is discovered to have eye-widening moral import, does that count against it at all? Actual responses by philosophers to the question of whether unanticipated moral consequences of metaphysical theories have evidential force are scattered, implicit, divergent, under-argued, and sometimes even self-undermining. The present discussion is, most immediately, an attempt to sort out the confusion. Beyond that, it exploits the new perspective this question gives us on a familiar topic: the relation of philosophy to science.
Keywords Moral immunity  Naturalism  Metaphysics  Metametaphysics
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2020
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s12136-019-00415-y
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Extended Mind.Andy Clark & David J. Chalmers - 1998 - Analysis 58 (1):7-19.

View all 56 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Science’s Immunity to Moral Refutation.Alex Barber - 2013 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (4):633-653.
The Philosophy of Jesus.Peter Kreeft - 2007 - St. Augustine's Press.
Supervenience, Externalism and Moral Knowledge.William Tolhurst - 1986 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 24 (S1):43-55.
The RM Paraconsistent Refutation System.Tomasz Skura - 2009 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 18 (1):65-70.
On Refutation Rules.Tomasz Skura - 2011 - Logica Universalis 5 (2):249-254.
The Metaphysics of William Ockham.Fr Philotheus Boehner - 1948 - Review of Metaphysics 1 (4):59-86.
A Refutation Theory.Tomasz Skura - 2009 - Logica Universalis 3 (2):293-302.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-12-06

Total views
44 ( #226,838 of 2,403,576 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #62,129 of 2,403,576 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes