Qu'y a-t-il au-delà de la psychologie?

Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 189 (3):345 - 361 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Il semble que la philosophie doive abandonner ses prétentions fondationnalistes par rapport à la psychologie. Mais est-elle, quant à elle, indépendante de la psychologie ? Le naturalisme contemporain est animé de la conviction inverse. L'auteur essaie de montrer ici, sur les exemples de Bolzano et de Husserl, ce que peut signifier l'adoption d'une attitude anti-psychologiste en philosophie. Il suggère que cette attitude est compatible avec une sorte de naturalisme problématique et spécifiquement philosophique. Philosophy must apparently give up its claims to a foundation of psychology. But is it itself free of any dependence on psychology ? Contemporary naturalism says it is not. The author attempts here to show, referring to Bolzano and Husserl, what to adopt an anti-psychologistic attitude in philosophy means. His proposal is that such an attitude is compatible with a kind of problematic and properly philosophical naturalism

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-30

Downloads
24 (#155,087)

6 months
24 (#640,997)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jocelyn Benoist
Université paris 1

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references