Argumentation Theory and the conception of epistemic justification

In Marcin Koszowy (ed.), Informal logic and argumentation theory. Białystok: University of Białystok. pp. 285--303 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I characterize the deductivist ideal of justification and, following to a great extent Toulmin’s work The Uses of Argument, I try to explain why this ideal is erroneous. Then I offer an alternative model of justification capable of making our claims to knowledge about substantial matters sound and reasonable. This model of justification will be based on a conception of justification as the result of good argumentation, and on a model of argumentation which is a pragmatic linguistic reconstruction of Toulmin’s model of argument

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Argumentation Theory and the Conception of Epistemic Justification.Lilian Bermejo-Luque - 2009 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 16 (29).
Justification and Argumentation.Krzysztof Szymanek - 2014 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 36 (1):231-239.
A Unitary Schema for Arguments by Analogy.Lilian Bermejo-Luque - 2012 - Informal Logic 32 (1):1-24.
Argumentation, Arguing, and Arguments: Comments on Giving Reasons.John Biro & Harvey Siegel - 2011 - Theoria 26 (3):279-287.
Exchanging Reasons: responses to critics.Lilian Bermejo-Luque - 2011 - Theoria 26 (3):329-343.
Weighing and Balancing in the Justification of Judicial Decisions.Eveline Feteris - 2008 - Informal Logic 28 (1):20-30.
Giving Reasons, A Contribution to Argumentation Theory.Lilian Bermejo-Luque - 2011 - Theoria 26 (3):273-277.
On the processing of arguments.James F. Voss, Rebecca Fincher-Kiefer, Jennifer Wiley & Laurie Ney Silfies - 1993 - Argumentation 7 (2):165-181.
Justifying the Epistemological Theory of Argumentation.Christoph Lumer - 2024 - Informal Logic 44 (1):574-600.
Justifying the Epistemological Theory of Argumentation.Christoph Lumer - 2024 - Informal Logic 44 (1):574-600.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-28

Downloads
57 (#288,482)

6 months
8 (#415,703)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lilian Bermejo Luque
University of Granada

Citations of this work

Toulmin’s “Analytic Arguments”.Ben Hamby - 2012 - Informal Logic 32 (1):116-131.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Samuel Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Otto Neurath.
The concept of law.Hla Hart - 1961 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Naming and Necessity.Saul Kripke - 1980 - Philosophy 56 (217):431-433.
Philosophy of logic.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1970 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Edited by Simon Blackburn & Keith Simmons.

View all 223 references / Add more references