Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (6):817-818 (2005)

The target article by Henrich et al. describes some economic experiments carried out in fifteen small-scale societies. The results are broadly supportive of an approach to understanding social norms that is commonplace among game theorists. It is therefore perverse that the rhetorical part of the paper should be devoted largely to claiming that “economic man” is an experimental failure that needs to be replaced by an alternative paradigm. This brief commentary contests the paper's caricature of economic theory, and offers a small sample of the enormous volume of experimental data that would need to be overturned before “economic man” could be junked.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x05230145
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,044
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Game Theory.Don Ross - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Modeling Justice as a Natural Phenomenon.Ken Binmore - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (1):82-83.
Review. [REVIEW]Ken Binmore - 2011 - Journal of Economic Methodology 18 (2):177-181.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
158 ( #64,021 of 2,433,554 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #468,801 of 2,433,554 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes