Does the rhetoric work? Parental responses to new right policy assumptions

British Journal of Educational Studies 44 (3):296-306 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper examines the extent to which parents have absorbed New Right ideas about education and acted accordingly. What emerges is that their commitment to the rhetoric of school choice is strong. However, concepts such as the market and competition are viewed less favourably. An important theme here is the avoidance by parents of any collective agenda in discussing education policy, a factor that may thwart those who attempt to predict their responses to government policy for schools.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,897

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Does the Rhetoric Work? Parental Responses to New Right Policy Assumptions.Pam Boulton & John Coldron - 1996 - British Journal of Educational Studies 44 (3):296 - 306.
How Do We Acquire Parental Rights?Joseph Millum - 2010 - Social Theory and Practice 36 (1):112-132.
Social epistemology as a rhetoric of inquiry.John Lyne - 1994 - Argumentation 8 (2):111-124.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
22 (#709,312)

6 months
5 (#639,324)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Domestic Knowledge, Inequalities and Differences.Xavier Rambla - 2000 - European Journal of Women's Studies 7 (2):189-207.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Reforming Education and Changing Schools.Richard Bowe, Stephen J. Ball & Anne Gold - 1992 - British Journal of Educational Studies 40 (4):429-431.
Parental choice and educational reform in Britain and the United States.Tony Edwards & Geoff Whitty - 1992 - British Journal of Educational Studies 40 (2):101-117.
Mixed messages in education policy: Sign of the times?David Hartley - 1994 - British Journal of Educational Studies 42 (3):230-244.

Add more references