- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Rethinking the Criterion for Assessing Cia-targeted Killings: Drones, Proportionality and Jus Ad Vim
Journal of Military Ethics 12 (4):304-324 (2013)
Abstract
No abstractMy notes
Similar books and articles
On the Redundancy of Jus ad Vim: A response to Daniel Brunstetter and Megan Braun.Helen Frowe - 2016 - Ethics and International Affairs 30 (1):117 - 129.
Drone Warfare and Just War Theory.Harry van der Linden - 2015 - In Marjorie Cohn (ed.), Drones and Targeted Killing. Northampton, Mass.: Olive Branch Press, Interlink Books. pp. 169-194.
Jus ad Vim and the Just Use of Lethal Force Short of War.S. Brandt Ford - 2013 - In Fritz Allhoff, Nicholas G. Evans & Adam Henschke (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Ethics and War: Just War Theory in the 21st Century. Routledge. pp. 63--75.
Proportionality in international law.Michael A. Newton - 2014 - New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Edited by Larry May.
But Is It Good Enough? Jus ad Vim and the Danger of Perpetual War.Christian Nikolaus Braun - 2022 - Ethics and International Affairs 36 (4):527-537.
From Jus ad bellum to Jus ad pacem: Rethinking Just War Criteria for the Use of Military Force for Humanitarian Ends.George R. Lucas Jr - 2003 - In Dean Chatterjee & Donald Scheid (eds.), Ethics and Foreign Intervention. Cambridge University Press.
Jus ad Vim: A Rejoinder to Helen Frowe.Daniel Brunstetter - 2016 - Ethics and International Affairs 30 (1):131-136.
Targeted Killing for Retribution Only Is Practically Impossible: A Rejoinder to Christian Braun.Anh Le - 2021 - Journal of Military Ethics 20 (2):145-151.
Drones, Risk, and Perpetual Force.Christian Enemark - 2014 - Ethics and International Affairs 28 (3):365-381.
Saying 'No!' to Lethal Autonomous Targeting.Noel Sharkey - 2010 - Journal of Military Ethics 9 (4):369-383.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-20
Downloads
84 (#196,047)
6 months
5 (#836,975)
2014-01-20
Downloads
84 (#196,047)
6 months
5 (#836,975)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Just War and Robots’ Killings.Thomas W. Simpson & Vincent C. Müller - 2016 - Philosophical Quarterly 66 (263):302-22.
Robots and Respect: Assessing the Case Against Autonomous Weapon Systems.Robert Sparrow - 2016 - Ethics and International Affairs 30 (1):93-116.
Autonomous weapon systems and jus ad bellum.Alexander Blanchard & Mariarosaria Taddeo - forthcoming - AI and Society:1-7.
Jus ad Vim: A Rejoinder to Helen Frowe.Daniel Brunstetter - 2016 - Ethics and International Affairs 30 (1):131-136.
References found in this work
Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations.Barrie Paskins & Michael Walzer - 1981 - Philosophical Quarterly 31 (124):285.
Proportionality in the Morality of War.Thomas Hurka - 2004 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (1):34-66.
Moral Predators: The Duty to Employ Uninhabited Aerial Vehicles.Bradley Jay Strawser - 2010 - Journal of Military Ethics 9 (4):342-368.
The Case for Ethical Autonomy in Unmanned Systems.Ronald C. Arkin - 2010 - Journal of Military Ethics 9 (4):332-341.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-ktvwr uwo