What truth does the emotive-imperative answer to the open-question argument leave to moral judgments?

Journal of Value Inquiry 37 (3):341-352 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

11. Moral Claims and Epistemic Contexts.Michael Hymers - 2006 - In Susan Sherwin & Peter Schotch (eds.), Engaged Philosophy: Essays in Honour of David Braybrooke. University of Toronto Press. pp. 271-300.
Intrinsic Value, Alternative Possibilities, and Reason.Ishtiyaque Haji - 2010 - The Journal of Ethics 14 (2):149-171.
The Logic of Moral Discourse. [REVIEW]H. R. - 1956 - Review of Metaphysics 9 (3):517-518.
Which answers to the now what question collapse into abolitionism (if any)?Wouter Kalf - forthcoming - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.
Constraints on Free Inquiry.Philip Kitcher - 2001 - In Science, truth, and democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
True or false?Peter Winch - 1988 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 31 (3):265 – 276.
Moral judgment and emotions.Kyle Swan - 2004 - Journal of Value Inquiry 38 (3):375-381.
12. Braybrooke and the Formal Structure of Moral Justification.Tom Vinci - 2006 - In Susan Sherwin & Peter Schotch (eds.), Engaged Philosophy: Essays in Honour of David Braybrooke. University of Toronto Press. pp. 301-322.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
70 (#227,925)

6 months
1 (#1,721,226)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references