Motherhood and the moral load

Think 20 (58):55-68 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many of the decisions mothers face are morally intense. They're experienced as highly morally significant, and they are also often very morally complex, meaning that there aren't black-and-white, obvious answers to questions about what one morally may or must do. For example, I suggest that breastfeeding is complex in this way, despite a good deal of cultural pressure in favour of trying to do it. Acknowledging many of the decisions of motherhood as complex or as ‘grey areas’ is accurate, and also good for mums. But it also burdens mums with the responsibility of researching, discussing, thinking through, and ultimately making significant, complex moral decisions for themselves. I call this the moral load, taking inspiration from Emma's ‘mental load’. In the last section I consider what we could or should do to try to lessen the moral load as a burden on mums.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why Should I Be Moral?D. A. Lloyd Thomas - 1970 - Philosophy 45 (172):128 - 139.
Moral uncertainty and its consequences.Ted Lockhart - 2000 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Conflict Cases and the Limits on Corporate Moral Authority.Ayal Tirosh - 2013 - Binghamton Journal of Philosophy 1 (1):133-150.
A Dilemma for Moral Deliberation in AI.Ryan Jenkins & Duncan Purves - 2016 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 30 (2):313-335.
A Dilemma for Moral Deliberation in AI.Ryan Jenkins & Duncan Purves - 2016 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 30 (2):313-335.
Moral Uncertainty.William MacAskill, Krister Bykvist & Toby Ord - 2020 - Oxford University Press.
Moral Theory and Its Role in Everyday Moral Thought and Action.Brad Hooker - 2018 - In Aaron Zimmerman, Karen Jones & Mark Timmons (eds.), Routledge Handbook on Moral Epistemology. New York: Routledge. pp. 387-400.
Sweatshops, Context Differentiation, and the Rational Person Standard.John Alexander - 2011 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 18 (1):68-74.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-04-16

Downloads
24 (#155,087)

6 months
7 (#1,397,300)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Laura Frances Callahan
University of Notre Dame

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Virtue Theory and Abortion.Rosalind Hursthouse - 1991 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 20 (3):223-246.
Abortion and embodiment.Catriona Mackenzie - 1992 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 70 (2):136 – 155.
Motherhood and Mistakes about Defeasible Duties to Benefit.Fiona Woollard - 2018 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 97 (1):126-149.
Measuring mothering.Rebecca Kukla - 2008 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 1 (1):67-90.
Breastfeeding and defeasible duties to benefit.Fiona Woollard & Lindsey Porter - 2017 - Journal of Medical Ethics 43 (8):515-518.

View all 7 references / Add more references