Bradley's anti-relational argument: A reply to mr. Kulkarni

Philosophical Quarterly 8 (30):54-62 (1958)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/2216856

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The phenomenal concept strategy.Peter Carruthers & Benedicte Veillet - 2007 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (9-10):212-236.
In Defense of Relational Direct Realism.Kenneth Hobson - 2011 - European Journal of Philosophy 21 (4):550-574.
A Platonist’s Copernican Revolution.Darryl Wright - 1998 - Journal of Philosophical Research 23:1-28.
Are there irreducibly relational facts.Josh Parsons - 2009 - In E. J. Lowe & A. Rami (eds.), Truth and Truth-Making. Acumen Publishing. pp. 217-226.
Relations and Truthmaking.Fraser MacBride - 2011 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 111 (1pt1):161-179.
Color properties and color ascriptions: A relationalist manifesto.Jonathan Cohen - 2004 - Philosophical Review 113 (4):451-506.
The doomsday argument without knowledge of birth rank.Bradley Monton - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (210):79–82.
Bradley and Schopenhauer, and the Epicurean Argument Concerning Death.Mikel Burley - 2004 - Bradley Studies 10 (1-2):42-54.
Why the no‐miracles argument fails.Carl Matheson - 1998 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12 (3):263 – 279.
Bradley's anti-relational argument.N. G. Kulkarni - 1957 - Philosophical Quarterly 7 (27):97-108.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
29 (#547,786)

6 months
1 (#1,461,875)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references