Biology and Philosophy 20 (4):673-696 (2005)

Authors
Jason Robert
Arizona State University
Abstract
We attempt a conclusive resolution of the debate over whether the principle of natural selection (PNS), especially conceived as the `principle' of the `survival of the fittest', is a tautology. This debate has been largely ignored for the past 15 years but not, we think, because it has actually been settled. We begin by describing the tautology objection, and situating the problem in the philosophical and biology literature. We then demonstrate the inadequacy of six prima facie plausible reasons for believing that the tautology debate has been satisfactorily resolved (the PNS is strictly a methodological principle; scientific theories can contain tautologies; the scope of the PNS has been reduced; theories should be understood as models and not exceptionless laws; the widespread acceptance of the propensity interpretation of fitness; and the abandonment of operationalism and verificationism). We proceed to a detailed discussion of Brandon's law (D) describing the PNS, and show that law (D) seriously misrepresents the structure of evolution by natural selection. In the final sections, we provide and defend a novel reinterpretation of the structure of the principle (or, we prefer, model) of evolution by natural selection.
Keywords natural selection  Darwin  evolution  tautology  testability
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10539-004-2439-5
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,391
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Conjectures and Refutations.K. Popper - 1963 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 21 (3):431-434.
Objective Knowledge.Karl R. Popper - 1972 - Oxford, Clarendon Press.
Philosophy of Biology.Elliott Sober - 2000 - Westview Press.

View all 34 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Natural Selection.Robert Brandon - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
111 ( #80,902 of 2,326,160 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #130,279 of 2,326,160 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes