The Ego as Topic of Phenomenological Analysis

Ideas Y Valores 60 (146):59-72 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Husserl began by refusing the possibility to consider the ego as an essential center of reference for intentional acts. But later included it in phenomenological description as the center of reference for intentional experiences. The article analyzes those two moments and their possible correlation with the Kantian theory of the self, in order to highlight the significant difference between the two philosophers.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-13

Downloads
24 (#679,414)

6 months
4 (#862,833)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Bounds of Sense.P. F. Strawson - 1966 - Philosophy 42 (162):379-382.
The New Husserl: A Critical Reader.Donn Welton (ed.) - 2003 - Indiana University Press.
Teoría kantiana de la autoconciencia.Karen Gloy - 1991 - Estudios de Filosofía (Universidad de Antioquia) 3:75-86.

Add more references