Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (12):887-888 (2008)

Yanzhou Chen
New York University
Stuart Youngner
Case Western Reserve University
Venneman and colleagues argue that “do not resuscitate” (DNR) is problematic and should be replaced by “allow natural death” (AND). Their argument is flawed. First, while end-of-life discussions should be as positive as possible, they cannot and should not sidestep painful but necessary confrontations with morality. Second, while DNR can indeed be nonspecific and confusing, AND merely replaces one problematic term with another. Finally, the study’s results are not generalisable to the populations of physicians and working nurses and certainly do not support the authors’ claim that there is a movement to replace DNR with AND
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/jme.2008.024570
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,107
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Epicurean Equanimity Towards Death.Kai Draper - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (1):92–114.
The Epicurean View of Death.Eric T. Olson - 2013 - The Journal of Ethics 17 (1-2):65-78.
The Death Penalty, in Other Words, Philosophy.Kas Saghafi - 2012 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (s1):136-142.
“No Dr. Blue/Do Not Resuscitate”.Jane D. Hoyt - 1981 - Bioethics Quarterly 3 (2):128-132.


Added to PP index

Total views
41 ( #252,178 of 2,428,020 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #322,244 of 2,428,020 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes