CEO Accountability for Corporate Fraud: Evidence from the Split Share Structure Reform in China

Journal of Business Ethics 138 (4):787-806 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We use institutional-related theories and a unique natural experiment that enables an exogenous test of the influence of controlling shareholders on managerial accountability to corporate fraud. In China, prior to the Split Share Structure Reform, state shareholders held restricted shares that could not be traded. This restriction mitigated state-owned enterprise controlling shareholders’ incentives to monitor managers. The data examined show the SSSR strengthens incentives of state-owned enterprise controlling shareholders to replace fraudulent management. Our findings support the view that economic incentives are important to promote corporate governance and deter fraud.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Executive Compensation and Corporate Fraud in China.Martin J. Conyon & Lerong He - 2016 - Journal of Business Ethics 134 (4):669-691.
Media Coverage and Firm Valuation: Evidence from China.Jiwei Wang & Kangtao Ye - 2015 - Journal of Business Ethics 127 (3):501-511.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-03

Downloads
21 (#761,941)

6 months
4 (#863,607)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?