The Problem of Particularity in Kant’s Aesthetic Theory

In Kevin A. Stoehr (ed.), The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy. pp. 197-208 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

An early version of "Kant on the Normativity of Taste" above. Original abstract: In moving away from the objective, property-based theories of earlier periods to a subject-based aesthetic, Kant did not intend to give up the idea that judgments of beauty are universalizable. Accordingly, the “Deduction of Judgments of Taste” aims to show how reflective aesthetic judgments can be “imputed” a priori to all human subjects. The Deduction is not successful: Kant manages only to justify the imputation of the same form of aesthetic experience to everyone; he does not show that this experience will universally occur in response to the same objects. This is what I call Kant’s problem of particularity. After critiquing Anthony Savile’s attempt to overcome this problem by linking Kant’s aesthetics to the theory of rational ideas, I elucidate the concept of aesthetic attributes in a way that suggests a possible resolution to the problem of particularity.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,491

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kant on the normativity of taste: The role of aesthetic ideas.Andrew Chignell - 2007 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (3):415 – 433.
A new look at Kant's view of aesthetic testimony.Keren Gorodeisky - 2010 - British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (1):53-70.
Gerard and Kant: Influence and Opposition.Paul Guyer - 2011 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 9 (1):59-93.
Disconnecting Reality.Brit Strandhagen - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 12:31-35.
Aesthetic licence: Foucault's modernism and Kant's post-modernism.Salim Kemal - 1999 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 7 (3):281 – 303.
Kant, quasi-realism, and the autonomy of aesthetic judgement.Robert Hopkins - 2001 - European Journal of Philosophy 9 (2):166–189.
A Tale of Two Faculties.K. Gorodeisky - 2011 - British Journal of Aesthetics 51 (4):415-436.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
105 (#151,290)

6 months
2 (#644,763)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrew Chignell
Princeton University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references