The Ability System and Decolonial Resistance: The Case of the Victorian Invalid

Journal of World Philosophies 6 (2):45-60 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Determinations of ability/disability are rooted in coloniality, specifically in categorizations of race, gender, and animality as they bear on social formations. I elucidate this rootedness by weaving the “coloniality of ability” into María Lugones’ accounts of the coloniality of gender and the colonial-modern system as founded on the “human-nonhuman” difference. This enables me to reveal an “ability system” based on the “ability-bestiality” difference and delineate with more specificity liminal sites of oppression and resistance across the heterogeneous socialities of coloniality-modernity. From the perspective of the coloniality of ability that I develop, I focus on the liminality of the white woman Victorian invalid and that of the colonized “bestial” body in order to distinguish between two forms of colonial-modern liminality—“light” and “dark.” I also draw from this discussion two forms of colonial-modern oppression—“dehumanizing” and “bestializing”—and two related modalities of anticolonial resistance—“humanizing” and “decolonial.”

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-12-23

Downloads
305 (#69,440)

6 months
123 (#39,758)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rachel Cicoria
Texas A&M University

Citations of this work

Brilliant Imperfection: Grappling with Cure. [REVIEW]Rachel Cicoria - 2022 - Journal of Philosophy of Disability 2:249-255.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Toward a Decolonial Feminism.Marìa Lugones - 2010 - Hypatia 25 (4):742-759.

Add more references