Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (3):612-629 (2012)

The current ethical norms of genomic biobanking creating and maintaining large repositories of human DNA and/or associated data for biomedical research have generated criticism from every angle, at both the practical and theoretical levels. The traditional research model has involved investigators seeking biospecimens for specific purposes that they can describe and disclose to prospective subjects, from whom they can then seek informed consent. In the case of many biobanks, however, the institution that collects and maintains the biospecimens may not itself be directly involved in research, instead banking the biospecimens and associated data for other researchers. Moreover, the future uses of biospecimens may be unknown, if not unknowable, at the time of collection. Biobanking may thus stretch the meanings of inform and consent to their breaking point: if you cannot inform subjects about what their biospecimens will be used for, what can they consent to? Given that informed consent by individual subjects is the ethical gold standard, the seeming dilution of the concept in the context of biobanking is a profound problem.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2012.00694.x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,177
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Expanding the Ethical Analysis of Biobanks.Mark A. Rothstein - 2005 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (1):89-101.
Expanding the Ethical Analysis of Biobanks.Mark A. Rothstein - 2005 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (1):89-101.
The Consent Problem Within DNA Biobanks.Darren Shickle - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 37 (3):503-519.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Access, Entanglement, and Prosociality.Robert Mitchell - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (6):49-51.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

International Guidelines for Privacy in Genomic Biobanking.Adrian Thorogood & Ma'N. H. Zawati - 2015 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 43 (4):690-702.
Trade Model and Difference of the Countries' Trade Policies.Ji-yun Cao - 2007 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 5:58-64.


Added to PP index

Total views
22 ( #510,666 of 2,499,650 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,206 of 2,499,650 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes