Phenomenology, Meaning, and Measure

Philosophy Today 60 (1):237-252 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper responds to comments by Maxime Doyon and Thomas Sheehan on aspects of my book, Normativity and Phenomenology in Husserl and Heidegger (Cambridge University Press, 2013). Among the topics discussed are the relations between phenomenology and analytic philosophy, the difference between a Brentanian and an Husserlian approach to intentional content, the normative structure of the intentional content of noetic states such as thinking and imagining, the implications of taking a phenomenological approach to Heidegger’s concept of “being,” Heidegger’s “correlationism,” and the normative character of Heidegger’s analysis of Angst, death, and conscience.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What phenomenology ought to be. [REVIEW]Tobias Keiling - 2014 - Research in Phenomenology 44 (2):281-300.
Cognitive phenomenology: real life.Galen Strawson - 2011 - In Tim Bayne & Michelle Montague (eds.), Cognitive phenomenology. Oxford University Press. pp. 285--325.
On epistemic conceptions of meaning: Use, meaning and normativity.Daniel Whiting - 2008 - European Journal of Philosophy 17 (3):416-434.
The Fall of Sleep.Jean-Luc Nancy - 2009 - Fordham University Press.
Toward a unified theory of meaning and action.Donald Davidson - 1980 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 11 (1):1-12.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-01-21

Downloads
45 (#320,552)

6 months
14 (#126,197)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Steven Crowell
Rice University

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references