Disease Gene Patenting: The Clinician's Dilemma

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (4):433-435 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

One strategy for defenders of gene patenting is to adopt a constructivist interpretation of genetic testing to avoid the I argue that accepting this view (which seems to be the approach of the U.S. Office of Patents and Trademarks) results in an intolerable dilemma for physicians. They must either infringe patents or fail to act on all the medically relevant information they possess (malpractice)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Gene Patents Can Be Ethical.Glenn Mcgee - 1998 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (4):417-421.
The Double Nature of DNA: Reevaluating the Common Heritage Idea.Matthieu Queloz - 2015 - Journal of Political Philosophy 24 (1):47-66.
What's So Special about the Human Genome?Arthur L. Caplan - 1998 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (4):422-424.
Introduction.Myles W. Jackson - 2015 - Perspectives on Science 23 (1):1-12.
Gene patents.Richard M. Lebovitz - 2004 - Journal of Philosophy, Science and Law 4:1-14.
Legal Dimensions in Gene Ownership.David Koepsell - 2015-03-19 - In Michael Boylan (ed.), Who Owns You? Wiley. pp. 83–100.
Should Human Genes Be Patented?David K. Chan - 2005 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 12 (2):30-36.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
35 (#444,651)

6 months
8 (#506,022)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Magnus
Stanford University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references