The Paradox of Corporate Social Responsibility Standards

Journal of Business Ethics 125 (2):1-15 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to provide a constructive criticism of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) standards. After pointing out a number of benefits and limitations in the effectiveness of CSR standards, both from a theoretical point of view and in the light of empirical evidence, we formulate and discuss a Paradox of CSR standards: despite being well-intended, CSR standards can favor the emergence of a thoughtless, blind and blinkered mindset which is counterproductive of their aim of enhancing the social responsibility of the organization. We analyze three problems that might underlie the Paradox—namely the problem of deceptive measurements; the problem of responsibility erosion and the problem of blinkered culture. We apply the philosophical tradition of American Pragmatism to reflect on these issues in relation to different types of existing standards, and conclude by suggesting a number of considerations that could help both CSR standards developers and users to address the Paradox

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 79,898

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The limits of corporate responsibility standards.Andreas Rasche - 2010 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 19 (3):280-291.
Accountability in a Global Economy.Sandra Waddock - 2011 - Business Ethics Quarterly 21 (1):23-44.
The nature of managerial moral standards.Frederick Bird & James A. Waters - 1987 - Journal of Business Ethics 6 (1):1 - 13.
Corporate Sustainability Disclosure Standards: A Framework for Analysis.Cathy A. Rusinko & John O. Matthews - 2008 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 19:335-342.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
23 (#517,058)

6 months
1 (#479,521)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Consequences of Pragmatism: Essays 1972-1980.Richard Rorty - 1982 - University of Minnesota Press.
The public and its problems.John Dewey - 1927 - Athens: Swallow Press. Edited by Melvin L. Rogers.
Objectivity, relativism, and truth.Richard Rorty - 1991 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The collapse of the fact/value dichotomy and other essays.Hilary Putnam - 2002 - Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

View all 46 references / Add more references