The 'Ought' and the 'Can'

Con-Textos Kantianos 8:324-347 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Kant's conception of autonomy presents the following problem. If, following Kant's explicit lead, we consider autonomy as the universal principle of morality and ground of the actions of rational beings (e.g. G 4:452), then self-legislation is best understood as a prescription by reason to itself. Applied to individual cases of willing, the term 'autonomy' describes the bringing of a set of practical attitudes under rational legislation. Agents may count as autonomous then, insofar as and only to the extent that they are able to implement reason's prescription. This is the bare Kantian picture. The problem, as Schiller originally put it, is that this is also a picture of self-alienation, since parts of one's identity, feelings, emotions, and attachments, are kept at arm's length and treated with suspicion (e.g. AW XXb: 280). Schiller's point is that there must be something that makes autonomy different from mere rationomy. For Schiller this matters because he thinks that a rationalist prescriptive ethic is deeply unattractive and because, anticipating contemporary theories of personal autonomy, he wants to defend an integrative conception of autonomous agency. No such further commitments are needed, however, to see that the bare picture needs adding to it, to show how the principle of reason's self-legislation not only has a grip on individual agents, but also can express their autonomy

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Autonomy: The emperor's new clothes.Onora O'Neill - 2003 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 77 (1):1–21.
The Inaugural Address: Autonomy: The Emperor's New Clothes.Onora O'Neill - 2003 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 77 (1):1 - 21.
Autonomy: The Emperor's New Clothes.Onora O'Neill - 2003 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 77 (1):1-21.
Aristotle and the Dilemma of Kantian Autonomy.Hasse Hämäläinen - 2017 - International Philosophical Quarterly 57 (3):331-345.
Continuity in the History of Autonomy.T. H. Irwin - 2011 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 54 (5):442 - 459.
Kant's Conception of Personal Autonomy.Paul Formosa - 2013 - Journal of Social Philosophy 44 (3):193-212.
Reason and autonomy.Keith Lehrer - 2003 - Social Philosophy and Policy 20 (2):177-198.
Is Kant's Concept of Autonomy Absurd?Eric Entrican Wilson - 2009 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 26 (2):159 - 174.
Emotions, Reasons, and Autonomy.Christine Tappolet - 2014 - In Andrea Veltman & Mark C. Piper (eds.), Autonomy, Oppression and Gender. Oxford University Press. pp. 163-180.
Eudaimonist Autonomy.Mark LeBar - 2005 - American Philosophical Quarterly 42 (3):171 - 183.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-18

Downloads
87 (#142,491)

6 months
10 (#87,923)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Katerina Deligiorgi
University of Sussex

Citations of this work

Transcendental Freedom and its Discontents.Joe Saunders - 2018 - Con-Textos Kantianos 8:319-322.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Kant's Theory of Freedom.Henry E. Allison - 1990 - Cambridge University Press.
Causation.D. Lewis - 1973 - In Philosophical Papers Ii. Oxford University Press. pp. 159-213.
Problems of the Self.Bernard Williams - 1973 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 37 (3):551-551.
Asymmetrical freedom.Susan Wolf - 1980 - Journal of Philosophy 77 (March):151-66.

View all 32 references / Add more references