In Greg Dalziel (ed.), Rumour and Communication in Asia in the Internet Age. Routledge. pp. 46-61 (2013)

M R. X. Dentith
University of Waikato
Drawing on work by philosophers CAJ Coady and David Coady on the epistemology of rumours, I develop a theory which exploits the distinction between rumouring and rumour-mongering for the purpose of explaining why we should treat rumours as a species of justified belief. Whilst it is true that rumour-mongering, the act of passing on a rumour maliciously, presents a pathology of the normally reliable transmission of rumours, I will argue that rumours themselves have a generally reliable transmission process, that of rumouring, and should be considered to be examples of warranted beliefs. My argument will also touch on the association of rumours with another class of beliefs that are usually considered to be suspect, conspiracy theories. I will argue that whilst rumours are reliable (as a mechanism for the transmission of justified beliefs) the analysis of the transmission of conspiracy theories requires us to realise they are different to rumours in some important respects.
Keywords conspiracy theories  rumours  gossip  social epistemology
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Epistemology of Testimony.Jennifer Lackey & Ernest Sosa (eds.) - 2006 - Oxford University Press.
Introduction.Jennifer Lackey - 2006 - In Jennifer Lackey & Ernest Sosa (eds.), The Epistemology of Testimony. Oxford University Press. pp. 1-24.
Pathologies of Testimony.C. A. J. Coady - 2006 - In Jennifer Lackey & Ernest Sosa (eds.), The Epistemology of Testimony. Clarendon Press.
Introduction: French Philosophy and Science.Douglas Lackey - 2006 - Philosophical Forum 37 (1):1–2.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Rumour Has It.David Coady - 2006 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 20 (1):41-53.
Denying Rumours.J. -B. Renard - 2007 - Diogenes 54 (1):43-58.
The 'Rumours' of Journalism.Emmanuel Taïeb - 2007 - Diogenes 54 (1):107-124.
In Defence of Conspiracy Theories.Matthew Dentith - 2012 - Dissertation, University of Auckland
Conspiracy Theories and Official Stories.David Coady - 2003 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 (2):197-209.
Introduction: Conspiracy Theories.David Coady - 2007 - Episteme 4 (2):131-134.
Conspiracy Theories and Conspiracy Theorizing.Steve Clarke - 2002 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32 (2):131-150.
Counterfact Conspiracy Theories.Susan Feldman - 2011 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (1):15-24.
Complots of Mischief.Charles Pigden - 2006 - In David Coady (ed.), Conspiracy Theories: The Philosophical Debate. Ashgate. pp. 139-166.


Added to PP index

Total views
588 ( #9,010 of 2,349,556 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
90 ( #6,036 of 2,349,556 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes