Journal of Media Law 3 (2):169-177 (2011)

Authors
Abstract
What, if anything, justifies incursions into the private lives of public figures? In Campbell v MGN Ltd, the House of Lords established that a public figure could have no reasonable expectation of privacy if they made false statements to the public about their private life. In such circumstances, in order to ‘put the record straight’, the press may legitimately intrude without the public figure’s consent into that area of their private life about which they misled the public. What would otherwise constitute an illegitimate intrusion into the public figure’s private life is legally permissible if the purpose of the intrusion is to expose to the public a falsity that the public figure had propagated about their private life. In this paper, I argue that there are strong moral and policy reasons against this ‘putting the record straight’ principle (‘PRS’). Principally, PRS is at odds with a central purpose of the right to privacy. Under PRS, public figures who engage in hypocrisy lose legal protection for their private life with respect to that information about which their public pronouncements misled the public. If, as I will argue, hypocrisy is an important (perhaps essential) expression of one’s right to privacy and tool for protecting one’s private life then, under PRS, public figures could lose protection for their right to privacy merely by its exercise.
Keywords Privacy  Public Office  Right to Privacy  Media Ethics  Hypocrisy  Lying  Public Figure  Celebrities  Transparency
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 55,981
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Privacy and the Public/Private Dichotomy.Simon Dawes - 2011 - Thesis Eleven 107 (1):115-124.
Privacy and Punishment.Mark Tunick - 2013 - Social Theory and Practice 39 (4):643-668.
The Journalist and Privacy.Louis Hodges - 1994 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 9 (4):197 – 212.
Public/Private.Paul Fairfield - 2005 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Four Challenges for a Theory of Informational Privacy.Luciano Floridi - 2006 - Ethics and Information Technology 8 (3):109-119.
Search Engines, Personal Information and the Problem of Privacy in Public.Herman T. Tavani - 2005 - International Review of Information Ethics 3:39-45.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-12-16

Total views
22 ( #467,929 of 2,403,526 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #256,481 of 2,403,526 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes