Miracles: MALCOLM L. DIAMOND

Religious Studies 9 (3):307-324 (1973)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The status of religion in the modern world is intimately related to the rise of science. The clearest way of getting at this relation is to consider the issue of miracle. Given the success of scientists in predicting and controlling natural phenomena, many of the leading theologians of the modern era abandoned the understanding of miracle as a supernatural violation of natural regularities. They conceded the capacity of scientists to offer natural explanations of phenomena that are naturally observable and shifted their theological focus from the observable patterns of nature to morality, religious experience, and history. Although many liberal and existentialistic theologians affirmed the miraculous, especially with regard to the Resurrection, they avoided a head on collision with science

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
6 (#711,559)

6 months
3 (#1,723,834)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Defining Miracles: Violations of the Laws of Nature.Morgan Luck - 2011 - Philosophy Compass 6 (2):133--141.
Defining Miracles: Direct vs. Indirect Causation.Morgan Luck - 2016 - Philosophy Compass 11 (5):267-276.
Miracles with method.John B. Gill - 1977 - Sophia 16 (3):19 - 26.
Miracles and Theism.Leon Pearl - 1988 - Religious Studies 24 (4):483 - 495.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references