Journal of Business Ethics 30 (4):337 - 359 (2001)
To effectively pursue ethical action, the business community must recognize that the fundamental form of human association is not the "social contract" into which persons enter as atomic individuals, making partial commitments to each other for the purpose of gaining limited common ends or of satisfying certain laws. The fundamental form of human association is rather the face to face community in which ongoing commitments are the rule and in which aspects of every individual''s experience are conditioned by the continuing membership. The following discussion initiates a preliminary phase in the consideration of what constitutes ethical issues associated with the business applications of expert systems. The focus is on knowledge based expert system applications in public accounting, specifically in the audit domain. Prior research on the development and use of expert systems in auditing has focused on a limited set of ethical issues. Niebuhr''s theory of the "the responsible self" is used here to broaden the scope of what constitutes an ethical issue and provides a framework for identifying responsible action. Within this framework, an action is responsible if it takes into consideration ongoing relationships among the stakeholder groups affected. Actions prior to the development of the system along with the potential consequences for the system must be considered. The discursive requirements that provide the context and conditions necessary for implementing the proposed theoretical framework are presented and an illustration of how the responsibility ethic can be implemented in the audit expert system domain is developed.
|Keywords||expert systems information technology responsibility ethics stakeholder committee systems development|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Ethics and the Networked Business.Adele Santana, Antonino Vaccaro & Donna J. Wood - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 90 (4):661 - 681.
Social Capital: A Review From an Ethics Perspective.Angela Ayios, Ronald Jeurissen, Paul Manning & Laura J. Spence - 2014 - Business Ethics: A European Review 23 (1):108-124.
Call for Papers: Special Issue/Forum.Donna J. Wood, Antonino Vaccaro & Adele Queiroz - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 85 (3):277-279.
Similar books and articles
Witness for the Plaintiff: Ethical Considerations of Being a Libel Plaintiff's Expert Witness.Michael Perkins - 1997 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 12 (2):69 – 81.
Clinical Audit and Reform of the UK Research Ethics Review System.E. Cave & C. Nichols - 2007 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (3):181-203.
A Corporate Social Responsibility Audit Within a Quality Management Framework.Ton van der Wiele, Peter Kok, Richard McKenna & Alan Brown - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 31 (4):285 - 297.
Beyond Agency and Structure: Triple-Loop Learning. [REVIEW]Kristi Yuthas, Jesse F. Dillard & Rodney K. Rogers - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 51 (2):229-243.
How to Be a Responsible Slave: Managing the Use of Expert Information Systems. [REVIEW]Emma Rooksby - 2009 - Ethics and Information Technology 11 (1):81-90.
Legal Implications in Development and Use of Expert Systems in Agriculture.Willard Downs & Kelley Ann Newton - 1989 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 2 (1):53-58.
Ethical Audit Decisions: A Structuration Perspective. [REVIEW]Jesse F. Dillard & Kristi Yuthas - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 36 (1-2):49 - 64.
Artificial Decision-Making and Artificial Ethics: A Management Concern. [REVIEW]Omar E. M. Khalil - 1993 - Journal of Business Ethics 12 (4):313 - 321.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #283,454 of 2,168,156 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #346,757 of 2,168,156 )
How can I increase my downloads?