Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (1):215-225 (2017)

Authors
Vilius Dranseika
Jagiellonian University
Jan Piasecki
Jagiellonian University Medical College
Abstract
In this article, we seek to contribute to the debate on the requirement of disclosure in the context of informed consent for research. We defend the subjective standard of disclosure and describe ways to implement this standard in research practice. We claim that the researcher should make an effort to find out what kinds of information are likely to be relevant for those consenting to research. This invites researchers to take empirical survey information seriously, attempt to understand the cultural context, talk to patients to be better able to understand what can be potentially different concerns and interests prevalent in the target population. The subjective standard of disclosure should be seen as a moral ideal that perhaps can never be perfectly implemented but still can and should be used as a normative ideal guiding research practice. In the light of these discussions, we call for more empirical research on what considerations are likely to be perceived as relevant by potential research participants recruited from different socio-economic and cultural groups.
Keywords Informed consent  Relevant information  Research ethics  Manipulation  Disclosure
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-016-9755-4
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,901
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Principles of Biomedical Ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1979 - Oxford University Press.
Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics.Onora O'Neill - 2002 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Consent Problem Within DNA Biobanks.Darren Shickle - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 37 (3):503-519.
Balancing the Quality of Consent.M. O. Hansson - 1998 - Journal of Medical Ethics 24 (3):182-187.
Consent for Data on Consent.Mollie Gerver - 2015 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (4):799-816.
Informed Consent: Its History, Meaning, and Present Challenges.Tom L. Beauchamp - 2011 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (4):515-523.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-01-20

Total views
26 ( #412,108 of 2,439,081 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #283,027 of 2,439,081 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes