Abstraction and the 'Esse' is 'Percipi' Thesis

Dissertation, The Ohio State University (1987)

Abstract
The dissertation is divided into two parts. In Part One, Locke's theory of abstract general ideas is introduced and it is explained how it is to be used in giving an account of how certain common nouns refer. In the second chapter, Berkeley's attack on the theory of abstract ideas is described. In the third chapter, a defense of the doctrine proposed by J. L. Mackie is considered. It is argued that this fails as it stands, but the chapter goes on to suggest how Mackie's account can be revised so as to overcome these shortcomings. In Part Two, some aspects of current thinking concerning one of Berkeley's central arguments for Esse is Percipi is discussed. In the chapter following this discussion, another interpretation of the argument for Esse is Percipi is proposed and an attempt is made to explain how this interpretation overcomes some of the problems connected with other interpretations. In the last chapter, an attempt is made to show that there is a direct connection between the doctrine of abstract ideas and the Esse is Percipi thesis. More exactly, it is argued that if there are abstract ideas, then the Esse is Percipi thesis is false.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,759
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Berkeley, Suárez, and the Esse-Existere Distinction.Stephen H. Daniel - 2000 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 74 (4):621-636.
A Oposição de Berkeley Ao Ceticismo.Jaimir Conte - 2008 - Cadernos de História de Filosofia da Ciência 18 (2):3225-355.
Book Review. [REVIEW]Michael Newman - 1990 - British Journal of Aesthetics 30 (4):390-392.
Book Reviews. [REVIEW]Jay Newman, Martin A. Bertman & Finngeir Hiorth - 1992 - Philosophia 21 (3-4):339-349.
Berkeley's "Esse Is Percipi" and Collier's "Simple" Argument.Tom Stoneham - 2006 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 23 (3):211-224.
L'esse est percipi de Berkeley.T. E. Jessop - 1953 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 143:153 - 163.
Berkeley's Philosophy of Mathematics.Douglas M. Jesseph - 1995 - In Kenneth Winkler (ed.), Philosophical Review. Cambridge University Press. pp. 126-128.
Abstract Ideas and the New Theory of Vision.George S. Pappas - 2002 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 10 (1):55 – 69.
Esse Est Percipi Once Again.Joseph Margolis - 1967 - Dialogue 5 (4):516-524.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-02-05

Total views
0

Recent downloads (6 months)
0

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes