Catherine Driscoll
North Carolina State University
In order to explain why cultural traits remain stable despite the error-proneness of social learning, Dan Sperber has proposed that human psychology and ecology lead to cultural traits being transformed in the direction of attractors. This means that simple-minded Darwinian models of cultural evolution are not appropriate. Some scientists and philosophers have been concerned that Sperber’s notion of attractors might show more than this, that attractors destroy subtle cultural variation and prevent adaptive cultural evolutionary processes from occurring. I show that Sperber’s view does not have this consequence—that even if there are attractors, cumulative cultural evolution can still occur
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/bjps/axq032
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,337
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Religion as an Evolutionary Byproduct: A Critique of the Standard Model.Russell Powell & Steve Clarke - 2012 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63 (3):457-486.
Sociobiology.Harmon Holcomb & Jason M. Byron - 2005 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Sociobiology.Harmon Holcomb - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
51 ( #222,573 of 2,508,113 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,711 of 2,508,113 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes