Sins, Voluntary and Involuntary: Recognizing the Limits of Double Effect

Christian Bioethics 3 (2):173-180 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Because sin is anything that turns our heart from God, sins are both voluntary and jnvoluntary. As a consequence, double effect can only be adequately understood in a Christian context in which it is recognized that, even when evil is not willed, our involvement in its causation can still mar our hearts. The acknowledgement of involuntary sins resituates double effect so that the traditional Christian concern with spiritual harm and healing can be maintained. In this way, one can overcome the underdeveloped Western theological appreciation of double effect, which ignores the effect on the heart of causing evil

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-04-06

Downloads
53 (#293,293)

6 months
13 (#276,301)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Danger of Double Effect.Philip A. Reed - 2012 - Christian Bioethics 18 (3):287-300.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Medico-moral problems.Gerald Kelly - 1958 - St. Louis,: Catholic Hospital Association of the United States and Canada.

Add more references