Neuroethics 4 (3):235-249 (2011)
One objection to enhancement technologies is that they might lead us to live inauthentic lives. Memory modification technologies (MMTs) raise this worry in a particularly acute manner. In this paper I describe four scenarios where the use of MMTs might be said to lead to an inauthentic life. I then undertake to justify that judgment. I review the main existing accounts of authenticity, and present my own version of what I call a “true self” account (intended as a complement, rather than a substitute, to existing accounts). I briefly describe current and prospective MMTs, distinguishing between memory enhancement and memory editing . Moving then to an assessment of the initial scenarios in the light of the accounts previously described, I argue that memory enhancement does not, by its very nature, raise serious concerns about authenticity. The main threat to authenticity posed by MMTs comes, I suggest, from memory editing. Rejecting as inadequate the worries about identity raised by the President’s Council on Bioethics in Beyond Therapy , I argue instead that memory editing can cause us to live an inauthentic life in two main ways: first, by threatening its truthfulness, and secondly, by interfering with our disposition to respond in certain ways to some past events, when we have reasons to respond in such ways. This consideration allows us to justify the charge of inauthenticity in cases where existing accounts fail. It also gives us a significant moral reason not to use MMTs in ways that would lead to such an outcome
|Keywords||Authenticity Enhancement Fitting attitudes Identity Memory modification President’s council on bioethics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
The Strike of the Demon: On Fitting Pro‐Attitudes and Value.Wlodek Rabinowicz & Toni Rønnow‐Rasmussen - 2004 - Ethics 114 (3):391-423.
The Reasons of Love.Harry G. Frankfurt - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (2):463-475.
Cognitive Enhancement: Methods, Ethics, Regulatory Challenges. [REVIEW]Nick Bostrom - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):311-341.
Citations of this work BETA
Hyperagency and the Good Life – Does Extreme Enhancement Threaten Meaning?John Danaher - 2014 - Neuroethics 7 (2):227-242.
Memory Interventions in the Criminal Justice System: Some Practical Ethical Considerations.Laura Y. Cabrera & Bernice S. Elger - forthcoming - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry:1-9.
Neuroethics Beyond Normal.John R. Shook & James Giordano - 2016 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 25 (1):121-140.
Brain-Brain Integration in 2035: Metaphysical and Ethical Implications.Soraj Hongladarom - 2015 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 13 (3/4):205-217.
Medikamentöse Gedächtnismodifikation zur Prävention der Posttraumatischen Belastungsstörung: eine ethische Bewertung. [REVIEW]Matthias Guth & Ralf J. Jox - 2013 - Ethik in der Medizin 26 (2):1-15.
Similar books and articles
True to Oneself? Broad and Narrow Ideas on Authenticity in the Enhancement Debate.L. L. E. Bolt - 2007 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (4):285-300.
Authenticity Anyone? The Enhancement of Emotions Via Neuro-Psychopharmacology.Felicitas Kraemer - 2011 - Neuroethics 4 (1):51-64.
Autonomy and Authenticity of Enhanced Personality Traits.Jan Christoph Bublitz & Reinhard Merkel - 2009 - Bioethics 23 (6):360-374.
Memory of Time in the Light of Flesh.Charles Scott - 1999 - Continental Philosophy Review 32 (4):421-432.
One Man's Authenticity is Another Man's Betrayal: A Reply to Levy.Alexandre Erler - 2012 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 29 (3):257-265.
Therapeutic Forgetting: The Legal and Ethical Implications of Memory Dampening.Adam J. Kolber - 2006 - Vanderbilt Law Review 59 (5):1561-1626.
What's Bad About Bad Faith?Simon D. Feldman & Allan Hazlett - 2013 - European Journal of Philosophy 21 (1):50-73.
Our Faithfulness to the Past: Reconstructing Memory Value.Sue Campbell - 2006 - Philosophical Psychology 19 (3):361 – 380.
The Epistemological Disunity of Memory.Fabrice Teroni - 2014 - In Anne Reboul (ed.), Mind, Values and Metaphysics: Philosophical Papers Dedicated to Kevin Mulligan, vol. 2. Springer. pp. 183-202.
To Remember Memory.Ella Buceniece - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 21:15-24.
Where is the Classic Interference Theory for Sleep and Memory?Anton Coenen - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):67-68.
Added to index2010-11-18
Total downloads100 ( #49,046 of 2,152,626 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #185,045 of 2,152,626 )
How can I increase my downloads?