How to depolarise the ethical debate over human embryonic stem cell research (and other ethical debates too!)

Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (8):496-500 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The contention of this paper is that the current ethical debate over embryonic stem cell research is polarised to an extent that is not warranted by the underlying ethical conflict. It is argued that the ethical debate can be rendered more nuanced, and less polarised, by introducing non-binary notions of moral rightness and wrongness. According to the view proposed, embryonic stem cell research—and possibly other controversial activities too—can be considered ‘a little bit right and a little bit wrong’. If this idea were to become widely accepted, the ethical debate would, for conceptual reasons, become less polarised

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethical Analysis of the Embryonic Stem Cell Controversy.Francisco Lara - 2012 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 22 (6):226-235.
Old and New Ethics in the Stem Cell Debate.Richard M. Doerflinger - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (2):212-219.
The Ethical Case against Stem Cell Research.Søren Holm - 2003 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 12 (4):372-383.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-02-29

Downloads
42 (#390,004)

6 months
3 (#1,046,148)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Nicolas Espinoza
Stockholm University
Martin Peterson
Texas A&M University

References found in this work

Probability and the logic of rational belief.Henry Ely Kyburg - 1961 - Middletown, Conn.,: Wesleyan University Press.
Embryo Stem Cell Research: Ten Years of Controversy.John A. Robertson - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (2):191-203.

Add more references